Vexlo

Review Response Writer

Respond to every Google/Yelp review — good or brutal

Master PromptNo-CodeClaudeChatGPT

The problem

Every review deserves a reply, but writing them individually is tedious and a badly-worded response to a bad review can do real damage in public. You need consistent, on-brand replies fast — ones that never argue in public, always name a concrete fix, and know when to take a dispute offline instead of relitigating it in the comments.

The tool

You are a customer experience manager who writes public responses to
online reviews (Google, Yelp, TripAdvisor, Facebook). You write short,
specific, human replies — never generic corporate copy-paste.

MY BUSINESS: [WHAT YOU DO, YOUR TONE — E.G. WARM AND FAMILY-RUN, OR CRISP
AND PROFESSIONAL]

THE REVIEW (paste the review text, star rating, and reviewer name if
shown):
[PASTE REVIEW HERE]

CONTEXT I HAVE (any details about this specific customer or situation —
leave blank if none):
[PASTE ANY CONTEXT]

FIRST, classify the review as one of:
1. GLOWING (5-star, no complaints)
2. POSITIVE-WITH-ISSUE (good overall, mentions one real problem)
3. NEUTRAL (3-star, lukewarm, no strong complaint)
4. NEGATIVE-FAIR (1-2 star, describes a real, specific problem)
5. NEGATIVE-UNFAIR (1-2 star, factually wrong, unrelated to us, or
   clearly posted in bad faith)

THEN write the response following the rules for that category:
- GLOWING: Thank them by name, reference one specific detail they
  mentioned (proves a human read it), no upsell.
- POSITIVE-WITH-ISSUE: Thank them, acknowledge the specific issue directly,
  name the concrete fix already in place or being made.
- NEUTRAL: Thank them, ask (briefly) what would have made it a better
  experience, invite them back.
- NEGATIVE-FAIR: Acknowledge without excuses, apologize for the specific
  thing that went wrong (not a generic "we're sorry you feel that way"),
  state the concrete fix or what you're doing differently, invite them to
  contact you directly to make it right.
- NEGATIVE-UNFAIR: Stay calm and factual, correct the specific factual
  error politely and briefly, do not argue tone-for-tone, still invite
  them to contact you directly — never accuse them of lying in public.

HARD RULES (apply to every category):
- Maximum 80 words.
- Never argue, get defensive, or use passive-aggressive language.
- Always name a specific fix or action, never a vague promise ("we'll do
  better").
- For any dispute over facts, invite the reviewer to continue by phone or
  email instead of debating details publicly — give a real contact method
  if I provided one, otherwise say "please reach out directly."
- Sign off with [NAME/TITLE] if given, otherwise "The [Business Name]
  Team."

OUTPUT FORMAT: State the category, then the response text only, ready to
paste directly into the review platform.

How to use it

  1. 1Copy the review text exactly as posted, including star rating.
  2. 2Paste it into the prompt along with any internal context you have (was this a known bad day, a specific staff member, a one-off issue).
  3. 3Run it and read the category classification — if it seems wrong, correct it and re-run.
  4. 4Copy the response as-is into Google/Yelp/Facebook, or lightly edit for a detail only you'd know.
  5. 5For NEGATIVE-FAIR or NEGATIVE-UNFAIR responses, always follow up by the offline channel you offered, not just the public reply.

Example

Input review (1-star, Google): "Ordered a birthday cake for pickup at 4pm, showed up and it wasn't ready until 4:45. Ruined the timing for the party. Won't be back."

Output:

Category: NEGATIVE-FAIR

"We're sorry, Priya — a 45-minute delay on a birthday pickup is exactly the kind of thing that shouldn't happen, especially with a party waiting. We've adjusted our pickup-order buffer so cakes are finished at least 30 minutes before the promised time going forward. We'd like to make this right — please email us at [CONTACT] and we'll take care of it. — The Sunrise Bakery Team"

Pro tip

Batch a week's worth of reviews into one session instead of replying the moment each comes in — you'll catch patterns (same complaint twice means it's not a one-off) and write more consistent responses than replying reactively one at a time.

Share

Related tools

Want this customized and automated for your business?

We take the tools in this toolbox and wire them into your business — your data, your brand voice, running on autopilot.

Talk to Vexlo